Unveiled Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 Well this really changes my mind about things. I just saw this video, and it could completely be true. On the other hand, people always try complicating things and it could've just been the plane hitting the building causing it to collapse. There were probably explosives and lots of gas fuel in the plane which gave more power. Imagine a plane hitting a skyscraper? You would think it would collapse would it not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NPSF3001 Posted December 28, 2008 Share Posted December 28, 2008 LOL, the consiparcy theory is just that, - a conspiracy theory. Yeah, i agree the videos etc are fun to watch but when you compare them to the fficial story they make less and less sence... If anyone has and concerns ill be happy to explain why i think this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizard Posted December 28, 2008 Share Posted December 28, 2008 LOL, the consiparcy theory is just that, - a conspiracy theory. Yeah, i agree the videos etc are fun to watch but when you compare them to the fficial story they make less and less sence... If anyone has and concerns ill be happy to explain why i think this. Please stop necromancing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NPSF3001 Posted December 28, 2008 Share Posted December 28, 2008 Necromancy: n. 1. The practice of supposedly communicating with the spirits of the dead in order to predict the future. 2. Black magic; sorcery. 3. Magic qualities. ? Elaborate PLZ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizard Posted December 28, 2008 Share Posted December 28, 2008 Necromancy: n. 1. The practice of supposedly communicating with the spirits of the dead in order to predict the future. 2. Black magic; sorcery. 3. Magic qualities. ? Elaborate PLZ. 4. Bringing back old, dead topics for the sake of postcount-boosting. Check the dates. If you want to bring back a topic, you must post something meaningful and detailed, not just your opinion... and also use better grammar. Plzthx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NPSF3001 Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 4. Bringing back old, dead topics for the sake of postcount-boosting. Check the dates. If you want to bring back a topic, you must post something meaningful and detailed, not just your opinion... and also use better grammar. Plzthx. LOL, I don't know if these topics are dead or not, but since they are within a month of my post (- and by looking at the post-date histories of these topics - that's a small wait), and still in the top half of the forum I find it is hard to believe that they are dead and buried. What's wrong with my grammar? (or is this just a distraction from the main point?). Normally I don't bring up topics as old as these, but as im not interfering that much in any other topic - and i have a specific interest in these issues io think this is valid resuscitation. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicOPromotion Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Umm so who sent this "missile" into the Pentagon? If you say the government, well why would they do that on 9/11? Did they say oh hey a plan hit the towers nows the time to do that thing we planned and hit the Pentagon??? Doesnt make sense. Also I hope you are not implying that the attacks on the WTC were set ups as well. And that those werent really planes. I saw it myself and believe me that was a plane. The other question is .. What about the people on board? Were they made up? _______ === XRumer 5.0 Palladium RULEZ! === Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicOPromotion Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 Umm so who sent this "missile" into the Pentagon? If you say the government, well why would they do that on 9/11? Did they say oh hey a plan hit the towers nows the time to do that thing we planned and hit the Pentagon??? Doesnt make sense. Also I hope you are not implying that the attacks on the WTC were set ups as well. And that those werent really planes. I saw it myself and believe me that was a plane. The other question is .. What about the people on board? Were they made up? _______ === XRumer 5.0 Palladium RULEZ! === Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryptex Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 I am the devil's advacit (however you spell it) when it comes to conpiracies, i look them up and then argue about them with my friends. I do not believe any of the conspiracy theories I read, but this one is very interesting. This one makes a lot of sense, but like all theories I read, you cannot prove either way without very violently interrogating the Government until they snapped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mokothemonkey Posted August 28, 2009 Share Posted August 28, 2009 Some people found evidence there were explosives planted near the base, I saw it on TV. Discovery channel never lies... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itesscap73 Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Theyre saying now that the plane was owned by Yankee pitcher Corey Lidle and he may have been on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mokothemonkey Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Theyre saying now that the plane was owned by Yankee pitcher Corey Lidle and he may have been on it. How can they say 'maybe' wouldn't they know if a yankee pitcher was in 9/11? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TriMethylXanthine Posted December 13, 2009 Share Posted December 13, 2009 I personally do not believe that 9/11 was a terrorist attack. I recommend you to watch the movie Zeitgeist (that's not spam, just an advice) to find out why.This theory seems quite real... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spikehackerinc Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 A really really really really (One more really for good luck!) really good documentary to watch, "Zeitgeist". I would recommend it to ALL!!! It touches on the 9/11 conspiracies, as-well as most things you really don't know about the Governments of the world! In a previous topic about the "Flat Headed People" (People who STILL believe the earth is flat), the idea of not believing everything you hear can really be a blessing and can teach people to think on their own accord and will hopefully make people more open minded, instead of just beliving everything you hear! We all have to understand that we were NOT at the pentagon and twin towers and therefor only know what we are told... And the majority of people in the world only know what the news told them. News as much as we would like to believe in, especially in the case of 9/11 really isn't a good idea. I have NEVER seen or heard mainstream reporting company that is not owned by a corporation which in turn is controlled by governments. Governments only let us know what they want us to know, they control all MASS media and can hide anything they want or even come up with the most [bleeped!] of stories! Just a little fact if anyone really is interested and I have proved this myself!!! But I will not just tell you and you believe me because I said it, instead be opened minded and do the research for yourself! " Al-Qaeda " DID NOT EXIST BEFORE 2001 AND WAS COMPLETELY CREATED BY AN "UNKNOWN" SOURCE. Try Google it, most probably the 1st thing that will come up is Wikipedia which states that Al-Qaeda was established in "1988", keep in mind that everything written on Wikipedia does NOT mean it is true and is contributed by the public. Infact at my University when doing research we are NOT allowed to use Wikipedia as a reference or source. Besides that, the entry of "Al-Qaeda" into Wikipedia database was only in 2004. This is only one example of what I'm on about and internet research is not the only source to find this info. better sources would be physical.... And BTW, the only TRUE info I could find on "Al-Qaeda", was it was a computer program concept project name created some years ago... WAY WAY Before the idea of it being a terrorist group. The Zeitgeist is ALIVE! Peace Out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashoat Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 I'm going to necromance because I'm the admin and I'll allowed to. Double standards ef tee dubs. Besides that, the entry of "Al-Qaeda" into Wikipedia database was only in 2004.2004 was also the year that Wikipedia got large enough to actually need more than one server... COINCIDENCE? I THINK NOT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.