cluelusshusbund Posted June 14, 2011 Author Share Posted June 14, 2011 From the perspective of Earth, we cannot see the Earth itself rotating either, we are far to small and the Earth is far too big. That is corect.!!! Perspective does have a huge amount to do with this and everything else in the world. I wasnt talkin about "that" or "anythang else in the world"... in my post above... i was talkin about the specific esample i gave... an in that esample... 2 contridictory conclusions are produced from the sam earth perspective... or can you esplain the Lunar Longitude Libration (we observe from earth) wit somptin other than the moon rotates on an internal axis.??? @cluelesshusband: On a separate and unrelated note, out of curiosity, are you a native English speaker? Depends on you'r perspective... you see... i was raized an schooled in a small town in Kentucky durin the 50's... lol.!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cl58 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 Perspective does have a huge amount to do with this and everything else in the world. I wasnt talkin about "that" or "anythang else in the world"... in my post above... i was talkin about the specific esample i gave... an in that esample... 2 contridictory conclusions are produced from the sam earth perspective... or can you esplain the Lunar Longitude Libration (we observe from earth) wit somptin other than the moon rotates on an internal axis.??? The example you gave doesn't really have two contradictory conclusions. You are saying that the moon doesn't appear to be rotating, but then you go on to say that it is. As I said with my example about the Earth rotating, not everything is exactly as it is visually. Therefore, you just proved that the moon does in fact rotate on an axis. @cluelesshusband: On a separate and unrelated note, out of curiosity, are you a native English speaker? Depends on you'r perspective... you see... i was raized an schooled in a small town in Kentucky durin the 50's... lol.!!! Is that a yes or a no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cluelusshusbund Posted June 14, 2011 Author Share Posted June 14, 2011 The example you gave doesn't really have two contradictory conclusions. You are saying that the moon doesn't appear to be rotating, but then you go on to say that it is. Hense... the contradiction in the observations made from the sam (earth) perspective.!!! In other words... from the perspective of earth (ie... wit blinders on) the moon is not observed to rotate... an also from the perspective of earth... the Lunar Longitude Libration we observe is esplained by the moon havin an internal axis of rotation... ie... observations made from the sam perspective (earth) produce contridictory conclusions.!!! Now... if you have a diferent esplination for the cause of the Lunar Longitude Libration "observed from earth"... then you will have shown the importance of usin a perspective (from earth) which gives less complete information than usin a sidereal perspective.!!! As I said with my example about the Earth rotating, not everything is exactly as it is visually. Yes... an i agreed.!!! Therefore, you just proved that the moon does in fact rotate on an axis. Thank you :-) ]@cluelesshusband: On a separate and unrelated note, out of curiosity, are you a native English speaker? Depends on you'r perspective... you see... i was raized an schooled in a small town in Kentucky durin the 50's... lol.!!! Is that a yes or a no? From my perspective... "a yes".!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cl58 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 The example you gave doesn't really have two contradictory conclusions. You are saying that the moon doesn't appear to be rotating, but then you go on to say that it is. Hense... the contradiction in the observations made from the sam (earth) perspective.!!! In other words... from the perspective of earth (ie... wit blinders on) the moon is not observed to rotate... an also from the perspective of earth... the Lunar Longitude Libration we observe is esplained by the moon havin an internal axis of rotation... ie... observations made from the sam perspective (earth) produce contridictory conclusions.!!! Now... if you have a diferent esplination for the cause of the Lunar Longitude Libration "observed from earth"... then you will have shown the importance of usin a perspective (from earth) which gives less complete information than usin a sidereal perspective.!!! What I am saying is that you just proved that it does in fact rotate. From my perspective... "a yes".!!! Is there a reason you are not giving me a definitive yes or no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cluelusshusbund Posted June 14, 2011 Author Share Posted June 14, 2011 Is there a reason you are not giving me a definitive yes or no? Of course... i thank thers reasons (causes) for everthang... hense... a deterministic universe.!!! I have plans to start a thred about "free will"... hope to see you thar :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cl58 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 In that case, I would love to know the reason why you cannot answer my question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cluelusshusbund Posted June 14, 2011 Author Share Posted June 14, 2011 In that case, I would love to know the reason why you cannot answer my question. Im selective about the personal information i give out.!!! Whats the reason you want that information.??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cl58 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 As I said, it was out of curiosity. It would have been much easier if you had just declined to answer and that would have been the end of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.