Quantum Media LLC Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Well, I had ubuntu, and just couldnt grasp the idea of how to install programs and [bleeped!] like that. So, I will just stay with what I am used to... WINDOWS *even though it suck large monkey dic*s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asgard Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 The only way a real comparison between both operating systems can be made is when you compare them [without prejudice] when there are no 'super duper', flashy, shiny skins installed - just the standard skin. Windows would win for sure then, especially Vista. Both OS's have customizable skins (Windows having to use WindowBlinds), so that won't really help either in a comparison. Linux is more customizable than Windows though, so I guess that eventually it'd make Linux the winner in that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyougi Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 The only way a real comparison between both operating systems can be made is when you compare them [without prejudice] when there are no 'super duper', flashy, shiny skins installed - just the standard skin. Windows would win for sure then, especially Vista. Both OS's have customizable skins (Windows having to use WindowBlinds), so that won't really help either in a comparison. Linux is more customizable than Windows though, so I guess that eventually it'd make Linux the winner in that... Depends on the distro. OpenSUSE has a pretty flashy KDE skin preinstalled, along with the Vista start-menu ripoff and Beryl. Well, I had ubuntu, and just couldnt grasp the idea of how to install programs and [bleeped!] like that. So, I will just stay with what I am used to... WINDOWS *even though it suck large monkey dic*s And that's why Windows still controls the vast majority of the marketshare. A Google search or a search on the Ubuntu forums would of told you that all you have to do is open Synaptic (a program), pick a program you want to install, and install it. If it's an install script, you just go along with what it says. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joemama718 Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 They don't agree with me that WITHOUT the use of any software like windowsblinds or object dock, Linux can actually look better than windows. well obviously because WINDOWSblinds is made for windows...but w/e you see in linux is software too... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AverageJoe Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 Well, Microsoft(more) gets paid so it can spend more time on making it look pretty. They also have more resources, as far as programmers go. But I still say fedora ftw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightwing14 Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 Windows Vista looks extremely good at the first site. After a couple of days your eyes will get bored and uncomfortable of the contrasts ... Linux looks simply good. If Tiger OS X was in the game I would definitely vote for it. Ehehe, yeah, Tiger OS X is major eye-candy. That's why I customised my PC to resemble it I used FlyAKiteOSX to make my PC look like a Mac =D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naynesh Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 In my opinion i would say Linux because it looks futurestic!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.